"Ernie Miller" <[email protected]> wrote:
The result would definitely be a complement to the original, which seems to me in keeping with the concept of "not" to begin with. In fact, over the weekend I modified the patch to handle complements more cleanly. That is, each predicate has a complement method which is used behind the scenes. This prevents successive negations from causing the accumulation of "nots" and using unnecessary memory with Not predicates containing Not predicates containing... you get the idea.
Well I have no further comments and since nobody ele appears to have anything to say, I'd submit the patch to arel's lighthouse (arel.lighthouseapp.com), and see if that gets any more response.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
