So am I. And every client project I've worked on for the past three years has used RSpec, whether that's been my choice or not. More often not.
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]> wrote: > Just for endorsing the stats, I'm one of those Rspec users :) > > Rodrigo. > > Em 14-06-2010 14:26, Allen escreveu: >> >> Along the same lines as the default javascript library discussion [1], >> why don't we switch the default test library to RSpec? The stats [2] >> posted by Xaviar in the other thread seem to support that RSpec is the >> preferred way to test. >> >> [1] >> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core/browse_thread/thread/e9b9cf2233d9a59b >> [2] http://survey.hamptoncatlin.com/survey/stats >> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > > -- Rick DeNatale Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick Twitter: @RickDeNatale WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
