If your target deployment is Ruby 1.9, you *should* use Hash that come with Ruby. It's guaranteed to be sorted, and it doesn't have the same overhead that AS::OrderedHash has.
Do you know that AS::OrderedHash is an array within array, and it's very slow? Hash in 1.9 is written in C, and doesn't suffer the same slowness. - Prem On Jul 14, 2011, at 9:37 PM, Andrew Kaspick wrote: > Why don't you want to rely on it? It's documented behaviour, so you > can totally rely on it. > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Alexey <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, i have asked this question here: >> https://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/2140803, but maybe you can answer quickly. >> Is ActiveSupport::OrderedHash going to be maintained in Rails? >> Its API page disappeared. >> I do not want to rely on Hash's being ordered in Ruby 1.9 (mainly because it >> is not called OrderedHash). >> Thank you, >> Alexey. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/FsZLFviGct0J. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
