Have you looked at RailsWizard (http://railswizard.org/)? Is this more or less what you would expect from your "rails configure" task? Except of course that it would be local. I really like the idea. Maybe even with hooks so others can add their plugin to the configure command? That would be too much for rails core, but I guess would work as a gem.
Regards, Andreas On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]>wrote: > ** > I find your propose too verbose to my taste :P > > But I'm sure others will like your idea. :) > > I think that an alternative interface to the command-line old fashioned > (and good by the way ;) ) prompt, would be being able to change this > defaults through the web interface. > > For instance, "rails configure" would open a web application in a new port > and address where you would be able to change your settings for the > application. > > Putting the interface in the web will get all the benefits of hyperlink, > explanations and the like at no cost :) > > I'm just doing some brain storm here. Didn't think very deep about this > yet... > > Best, > > Rodrigo. > > Em 01-09-2011 20:18, Everton Moreth escreveu: > > I always thought that something like that would be good, but too old > fashioned. > > An idea of mine (that I could never even start developing [shame on me] > until now) was a gem called rails-make > > The intent is to do something like that: > > rails make my js test framework to jasmine > rails make my js test framework to evergreen > > rails make my integration test framework to cucumber > rails make my integration test framework to steak > > rails make my unit test framework to rspec > rails make my unit test framework to unittest > > ... > > Or even: > > rails make my model Employee act as tree => adds gem "acts_as_tree" do > Gemfile, includes acts_as_tree on the model, bundle install ! > > > And the menu would be: > > rails what can I make? > > I don't know if it makes sense, but sounds awesome!! ^^ I would love to get > someone to help me develop that one! > > Everton Moreth > > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Now that the rails command is getting lots of options, maybe it would make >> sense to have some "rails interactive" command. Some possible workflow: >> >> What do you want to do? >> >> 1- Create a new Rails application >> 2- Run server >> 3- Generate a migration >> 4- Generate a model >> ... >> >> Suppose you click 1: >> >> 1- Create the application >> 2- Change test approach >> 3- Disable ORM - This would be "Enable ORM" if it was disabled >> 4- Disable tests >> 5- Change ORM implementation >> ... >> >> Now, suppose 2 was chosen: >> 1- Use TDD frameworks >> 2- Use BDD frameworks >> 3- Learn the differences >> >> Then, after choosing 2: >> >> 1- Change current Ruby test framework (Rspec) >> 2- Change current Javascript test framework (Jasmine) >> >> While clicking in 2 again: >> >> 1- Jasmine >> 2- Evergreen >> 3- Type a new one >> >> >> These are just some random thoughts. Make sense? >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
