Given that 1.9.3.dev is effectively an "immature" 1.9.3 RC, I would say, yes, it will have a similar performance. However, I would not go using 1.9.3 at this stage as it has not yet been officially released.
On Thursday, 8 September 2011 at 9:24 AM, Stephen Bannasch wrote: > I've got a large Rails app we are porting from v2.3.12 to v3.0.10. > > The app takes almost 60s to startup in development mode using Ruby 1.9.2-p290 > on my 2.66 GHz Intel Core i7 MacBook Pro . > > The app starts up about 2.7x faster on Ruby 1.9.3dev and the RSpec model > tests run about 50% faster. > > Will the 1.9.3 RC release have similar performance to 1.9.3dev? > > Ruby 1.9.2-p290 > > $ ruby -v; time bin/rails runner "" > ruby 1.9.2p290 (2011-07-09 revision 32553) [x86_64-darwin10.8.0] > real 0m50.333s > user 0m45.566s > sys 0m2.961s > > $ bin/rspec spec > Finished in 502.96 seconds > 1792 examples, 492 failures, 53 pending > > Ruby 1.9.3dev > > $ ruby -v; time bin/rails runner "" > ruby 1.9.3dev (2011-09-07 revision 33211) [x86_64-darwin10.8.0] > real 0m18.275s > user 0m15.750s > sys 0m1.587s > > $ bin/rspec spec/ > Finished in 345.59 seconds > 1792 examples, 492 failures, 53 pending > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]). > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]). > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
