On Mon, February 27, 2012 04:18, Xavier Noria wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Paul Gillard > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I often need to validate the absence of active record >> fields. That >> validation being the direct opposite of validating the >> presence of a >> field. Would the core team be willing to accept a patch >> to that >> effect? > > Interesting! Can you explain some uses cases? > > If it makes sense I think it could be added. >
Bot trapping with hidden fields that no human would complete? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:[email protected] Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
