Thanks Ben for the thoughtful words. I agree wholeheartedly. The way this issue is being handled illustrates why many rails lovers originally resorted to writing Merb, which was then borrowed from to create Rails 3 when the rails guys finally came to their senses. It also illustrates why one Russian guy recently got so frustrated at a few core guys refusing to listen to the masses, that he 0day hacked the rails repo, just to prove a point about why a certain decision was so evil for rails app security. Please stop making the masses of people who care about rails resort to such tactics to be heard.
Dave On Mar 25, 10:49 pm, Ben Woosley <[email protected]> wrote: > 2. Generally return true/false, but may return other values instead if > there is a good reason to, such as the ability to conveniently provide > pertinent information (The core lib's position, my position and the > position of basically everyone else AFAICT) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
