As far as I understand this won't work for files I don't own, like
linked files from external resources in submodule directories.
I don't like the idea of copying the files from external projects and
rewriting them.
Cheers,
Rodrigo.
Em 07-05-2012 11:54, Rafael Mendonça França escreveu:
Yes, it should and it does. Please take a look at the Assets pipeline
guide[1].
[1]
http://guides.rubyonrails.org/asset_pipeline.html#coding-links-to-assets
--
*Rafael Mendonça França*
On Monday, 7 May, 2012 at 11:49, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
There are some times where I add some JavaScript libraries as
submodules to my project:
git submodule add git://... resources/project_name
cd assets/stylesheets/my_controller
ln -s ../../../resources/project_name/css/project_name.css
cd -
cd assets/images/my_controller
ln -s ../../../resources/project_name/img/sprite.png
While this works great in development mode, I have to create more
symbolic links to make it work under production as well.
Here is why. Under development mode the css is written like this:
.some-class { background: url(sprite.png) } /* relative URL */
Under development this file path is
"/assets/my_controller/project_name.css" while the image is located
at "/assets/my_controller/sprite.png".
When assets:precompile is run, project_name.css no longer exists and
the rule is appended to application.css, but the relative URL is not
rewritten to 'my_controller/sprite.png' or
'/assets/my_controller/sprite.png'.
The Grails Resources plugin supports URL rewriting for dealing with
this kind of issue that happens when using an asset pipeline:
http://grails.org/plugin/resources
http://grails-plugins.github.com/grails-resources/ (sorry,
documentation is not that good, but it works this way, I promiss)
It is not a good experience to have your application working under
development and stopping working under production due to things like
this.
Also, I like the idea of grouping my assets in sub-directories.
Shouldn't the Rails assets generator support URL rewriting in CSS for
supporting such an organized tree both in development and production
environment out of the box?
Am I missing something?
Best,
Rodrigo.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on
Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
