Thanks for answer. Will be more careful on posting too. Panayotis
On May 30, 11:46 am, Ryan Bigg <[email protected]> wrote: > This is not a core ruby on rails question. This would be more suited for the > Rubyonrails-talk mailing list. > > I will still answer it though. > > The reason for this is due to how it matches the route for the show action. > The route is like this: > > /posts/:id.:format > > This means anything following /posts that doesn't have a similar route > defined for it will go to show, such as your /posts/new. > > Just because you except the route doesn't mean it will stop ALL routes from > working that use that route. It means that it simply DOESN'T define the route > for it. Anything else can have a route defined for that and it will still > work. > > Please be more careful about what lists you post to in the future. > > -- > Ryan Bigg > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, 30 May 2012 at 18:30, Panayotis Matsinopoulos wrote: > > HI, > > > I have the following in my routes: > > > resources :photos, :except => [:new, :edit] > > > When I get "/photos/new" instead of getting a no route error, it > > routes to "show" and recognizes "new" as id. > > > Is that normal? > > > Panayotis > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
