+1 for this. It would be nice if you could also throw in support for :unscoped (to counter the effect of a default_scope on the association), but I suppose even if this doesn't support that out of the box I could always make an "unfiltered" scope on the association.
Sent from my phone On 2012-07-05, at 10:16 AM, Steve Klabnik <[email protected]> wrote: > I think I'd rather see scope than source_scope. > > But that's really bikeshedding. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
