Yeah, you'd _have_ to do something like that. Then you're not implementing the ActiveRecord pattern anymore, so I don't think it'd really be appropriate.
> Active Record uses the most obvious approach, putting data access logic in > the domain object. > > - http://martinfowler.com/eaaCatalog/activeRecord.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
