Anyone have some opinion? On Sunday, July 29, 2012 4:17:01 PM UTC-3, Gabriel Sobrinho wrote: > > Hi, > > Currently uniqueness validator uses database queries which not work for > nested forms. > > > For example, I have a company form which have many partners and each > partner have a person and a percentage. > > Using uniqueness validator, I can not guarantee someone will not be a > partner two times because the partners aren't on database yet. > > > We've implemented a validator similar to this one: > http://pastie.org/private/osa3pmono5l1ykrd7vipwa > > > I'm not sure if the uniqueness validator should handle it. > > Take a look: http://pastie.org/private/maxdpn4gmvftzcl2ka0mq > > > I'm not sure if it will be too complex to the proposal of uniqueness > validator but that is a common validation for each system I've worked in > last years. > > WDYT? Something like that should be on the active record or a gem? > > Cheers, > > Gabriel Sobrinho > gabrielsobrinho.com > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/tEgPCFXmO28J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
