Thanks Aaron for reply I write a gist for these cases, here you
are https://gist.github.com/3694068
On Monday, September 10, 2012 8:26:23 PM UTC+4, Aaron Patterson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:56:12AM -0700, Dmitry Vorotilin wrote:
> > Guys I want to ask you about current realization of method capture.
> There's
> > a case in tests where I want to capture output in subprocess, current
> > realization cannot do it because it doesn't reopen $std{out,err} and
> just
> > reassign this value. I think that's enough for many cases, do we need
> > another realization in reporting.rb? Or I can just place it in the
> tests.
> > It related to https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/7586
>
> Can you check to see if minitest's `capture_io` will solve the problem?
>
>
> https://github.com/seattlerb/minitest/blob/master/lib/minitest/unit.rb#L447-460
>
>
> If not, can you write a small example (outside rails) to demonstrate the
> problem? This sounds like something we might want to push up to
> minitest if possible.
>
> --
> Aaron Patterson
> http://tenderlovemaking.com/
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/xr7z4MFovNAJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
