> Does anyone have links to discussions or pages where the history of > association naming was discussed for those that think it doesn't make any > sense and want a better explanation as to why associative methods are named > as they are? >
Basically all of those associations were present in rails before there even was a mailing list. You'd have to rummage around the git history to see if they were all done before there was any outside assistance, but I suspect the conversations you're looking for were all in DHH's head ;) > Thanks. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/ay3rkyV5cVcJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]). > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]). > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
