What makes that solution better than the current (more readable) version? On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Robert Pankowecki < [email protected]> wrote:
> > Proposed alternative: > > > > production: > > uri: postgres://username:[email protected]:5432/production_db > > pool: 5 > > Alternative: > > production: "postgres:// > username:[email protected]:5432/production_db?pool=5" > > Robert Pankowecki > http://robert.pankowecki.pl > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
