Removed from group...

-- Chad

On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Peta Ward <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is a delivery failure notification message indicating that
> an email you sent could not be delivered. The problem appears to be :
> -- Recipient email server rejected the message
>
> This condition occurred after 1 attempt(s) to deliver over
> a period of 0 hour(s).
>
> If you sent the email to multiple recipients, you will receive one
> of these messages for each one which failed delivery,  otherwise
> they have been sent.
>
> On 14 Dec 2012, at 11:59, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>   Today's Topic Summary
>> Group: http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core/topics
>>       •       Proposal: ActionController class methods, all procs get 
>> evaluated [2 Updates]
>>       •       Should render collection: @items have a cache option so that 
>> read_multi can be utilized? [1 Update]
>>       •       Digest for [email protected] - 1 Message in 1 
>> Topic [1 Update]
>>  Proposal: ActionController class methods, all procs get evaluated
>>       •       Scott Carleton <[email protected]> Dec 13 09:35AM -0800
>>       •
>>       •       Specifically looking at action_cache in Rails.3.2 stable right 
>> now.
>>       •
>>       •       It currently will evaluate procs given to the layout or 
>> cache_path as can beseen 
>> here<https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/3-2-stable/actionpack/lib/action_controller/caching/actions.rb#L135>.
>>       •
>>       •
>>       •       I'm working on a library where I'd like to tag my caches so 
>> that I can
>>       •       expire sets of keys easily. It would appear that something 
>> such as
>>       •
>>       •       caches_action :show, tag: Proc.new { "post_#{params[:id]}" }
>>       •
>>       •       would evaluate to the tag to post_1, post_2 etc but it 
>> doesn't. It
>>       •       wouldn't take much to modify the filter method linked above to 
>> evaluate
>>       •       all procs passed in as options. I'm going to make a pull 
>> request unless
>>       •       there are any objections.
>>       •
>>       •       "Rafael Mendonça França" <[email protected]> Dec 13 
>> 06:28PM -0300
>>       •
>>       •       Action cache was extracted from Rails and it is not part of 
>> the framework
>>       •       anymore.
>>       •
>>       •       Rafael Mendonça França
>>       •       http://twitter.com/rafaelfranca
>>       •       https://github.com/rafaelfranca
>>       •
>>       •
>>       •
>>       •
>>  Should render collection: @items have a cache option so that read_multi can 
>> be utilized?
>>       •       nate <[email protected]> Dec 13 08:21AM -0800
>>       •
>>       •       I released a gem yesterday
>>       •
>>       •       https://github.com/n8/multi_fetch_fragments
>>       •
>>       •       that adds this syntax on rendering a collection of partials:
>>       •
>>       •       <%= render partial: 'item', collection: @items, cache: true %>
>>       •
>>       •
>>       •       And then the gem uses Rails read_multi to fetch any cached 
>> fragments of
>>       •       this partial. It can be a pretty big speed boost instead of 
>> fetching from
>>       •       Memcached sequentially. One guy saw a 93% improvement on an 
>> action of his
>>       •       that was simply rendering out 25 items.
>>       •
>>       •       Some folks have been asking me to post to this list to see if 
>> this is
>>       •       something that I should write a pull request for against Rails 
>> to become a
>>       •       standard feature?
>>       •
>>       •       -Nate
>>       •
>>  Digest for [email protected] - 1 Message in 1 Topic
>>       •       Peta Ward <[email protected]> Dec 13 12:45PM
>>       •
>>       •       This is a delivery failure notification message indicating that
>>       •       an email you sent could not be delivered. The problem appears 
>> to be :
>>       •       -- Recipient email server rejected the message
>>       •
>>       •       This condition occurred after 1 attempt(s) to deliver over
>>       •       a period of 0 hour(s).
>>       •
>>       •       If you sent the email to multiple recipients, you will receive 
>> one
>>       •       of these messages for each one which failed delivery, otherwise
>>       •       they have been sent.
>>       •
>>       •
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group 
>> rubyonrails-core.
> You can post via email.
> To unsubscribe from this 
>> group, send an empty message.
> For more options, visit this group.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.

Reply via email to