I think that this is something that would differ incredibly from app to app. For instance, I would not install Ruby using apt-get myself.
While I like the idea of having it be a "Getting Started" doc for an app, I don't think that Rails could come with a cohesive default that would work for everyone. -1 to this change. On 02/01/2013, at 11:52, Николай Шебанов <[email protected]> wrote: > Both hands are up. I think, this change can inspire people who work with the > resulting Ruby on Rails project to reference all project's workflow in a > README and keep it up-to-date. It isn't happening currently. > > We are supporting our project for more then a year, and only two months ago > we started to edit README. The one which is generated by rails is totally > useless. > > воскресенье, 16 декабря 2012 г., 3:36:39 UTC+4 пользователь Oguz Bilgic > написал: >> >> Most of the time I use readme.md file to explain how to properly install the >> dependencies and run the application for first time. I use [something >> like](https://gist.github.com/3058000) as a README.md scaffold. >> >> Just an idea, What would you guys think about replacing the current readme >> with something like this? >> >> https://gist.github.com/3058000 >> >> Oguz Bilgic >> Thanks > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/GwEL7QamEGkJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
