A less destructive approach would be to use Ruby 2.0's named arguments to have
something like:
link_to url: @person, body: "Click me"
That being said, I understand your point, but don't see it as a particular pain.
On Mar 15, 2013, at 12:58 PM, Michael Grohn wrote:
> I think the link_to helper method is quite confusing with its arguments order:
>
> link_to body, url
> link_to "Click me", @person
>
> Why is it thay way round? I want to make a "link to [the] person", so I would
> expect the order to be:
>
> link_to @person, "Click me"
>
> It reads much more natural. You don't "link to [the] body", you "link to
> [the] url". So the order schould be
>
> link_to url, body, options={}
>
> Is there a rationale for the current arguments order?
>
> I know, changing it would break compatibility but I think it's worth
> considering.
>
> - Michael
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
Cumprimentos,
Luís Ferreira
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
