On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:41:37AM -0800, Egor Homakov wrote: > https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/12374#issuecomment-29446761 > > Here in discussion I proposed to deprecate JS responder because this > technique is insecure and not pragmatic way to transfer data. > It can be exploited in this > way http://homakov.blogspot.com/2013/05/do-not-use-rjs-like-techniques.html > > i find this bug very often so i know what i'm talking about. With it > attacker can steal user data and authenticity_token if templates with form > were leaked too.
Removing it seems fine to me, but I suppose we should deprecate it first. Don't people need to specifically say "render js: whatever"? I think 100% of "render js:" cases can be implemented using JSON. But maybe I am wrong. -- Aaron Patterson http://tenderlovemaking.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
