lovely. That was exactly what I need. I'm going to make the suitable update to apidoc as well.
cheers. On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 17:45:05 UTC+10, Simon Courtois wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > Why not use has_one :through? I think it's what you need ;) > > Simon Courtois > > On 25 févr. 2014, at 04:25, Rob Dawson <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > Hi, > > Long time user of rails, fist time poster. > > It feels like there should be a belongs_to :through that behaves similarly > to has_many :through, but for the belongs_to side of the relationship. > > Any thoughts/reasons why this hasn't been done? > > I'd love to contribute something to rails, and this feature would be > scratching an itch/need that I have at the moment so seems appropriate. Let > me know if there is any value/interest in getting this done, and I can fork > the repo and start putting together the patch. Of course any guidance in > doing so would be greatly appreciated. > > Regards, > > Rob > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:> > . > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
