On 12 Sep 2014, at 23:01, Nicolás Sanguinetti <h...@nicolassanguinetti.info> wrote:
> I would much rather do `ActionView::Helpers::TextHelper.truncate(...)` if it > were possible. > > Does this seem interesting / useful to anyone else? I believe there's good precedent in ruby core/stdlib for this pattern. But I worry that it would be more confusing (/ difficult to document) for us to be widely inconsistent. I guess I'd need a feel for what proportion of our helpers would be module_function candidates. If it's a good number, then it does seem worth considering. If it's relatively few (and I suspect it might be?), then maybe not so much. Matthew -- matt...@trebex.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
