Claudio B. wrote: > > Abdelkader, is that the opinion of the Rails core group? In short, would > you like to see a PR where scaffold.css is gone and documentation is added > to specify how to make your scaffolded views look nicer? > > Personally, that's not what I had in mind when I began this conversation > (I thought it would be useful to make those views look *nicer *by > default, not *uglier* by default), but I can see your point. >
No!, That my personal opinion. IF the idea is accepted, the PR should target 5.0, that mean after 4.2-stable is branched. It will also need some PRs for the other gems, such as foundation-rails (bootstrap is already doing that). *nicer *by default is a question of taste, what was nice few month/year ago is probably bad now. No matter how nice we do it, once it because default, the nice effect will fade away with time. As i said in the previous email, the scaffolder is meant to help you prototype an app, it was never supposed to generate production ready views. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
