Considering the Rails guides give an example structure <http://guides.rubyonrails.org/i18n.html#organization-of-locale-files> of nesting view translations under "views", it feels like using the period convenience with the t() helper should by default look to the "views" i18n namespace, or at least provide an ActionView setting for a view namespace. This would bring the behavior of views more in line with that of models and keep from polluting the global i18n namespace with view-specific translations.
Maybe I'm totally off-base—does anyone have opinions on this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
