I feel like one of the more common use cases for with_options is an :if or
an :unless argument to validates, like so:
with_options if: :something? do
validates :thing, presence: true
validates :other_thing, numericality: { greater_than: 7 }
end
This breaks down when trying to nest multiple with_options blocks, because
the second :if overrides the first when calling Hash#merge. It would be
nice if I could do:
with_options if: :something? do
validates :thing, presence: true
validates :other_thing, presence: true
with_options if: :something_else? do
validates :third_thing, presence: true # only runs if something? &&
something_else?
end
end
Currently to get this to behave as expected I have to do:
with_options if: :something? do
validates :thing, presence: true
validates :other_thing, presence: true
end
with_options if: -> { something? && something_else? } do
validates :third_thing, presence: true # only runs if something? &&
something_else?
end
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
