Seems good to me. On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 4:04 AM Brandon Weiss <bran...@anti-pattern.com> wrote:
> I think the name "transactional fixtures" is a little misleading and > confusing, because (as far as I can tell) it doesn't really have anything > to do with fixtures. > > This is pretty embarrassing, but I've been using Rails almost since 1.0 > and I had no idea that transactional fixtures were running on my tests. I > don't use fixtures so I just erroneously assumed that feature didn't work > for me. I've been using Database Cleaner unnecessarily for like the last > four years. I know, it seems ridiculous, but I talked to a few other fairly > savvy Rails users and they had no idea either. I'm beginning to think my > misunderstanding is fairly common. > > Is there any interest in renaming the feature to something clearer and > more descriptive, like "transactional tests"? E.g. use_transactional_tests. > If so, I'd be happy to do the work to deprecate the old name, add the new > name, and rename/update everything where necessary. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
