See also this thread: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/rubyonrails-core/kqKoJHcQu9U/discussion
...wherein is discussed (without any official response from core contributors) many of the warts and limitations of RAILS_ENV in a modern, cloud-native-y, 12-factor-y world. -- Chad On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 6:15 AM, Vijay Raghavan Aravamudhan < [email protected]> wrote: > With the latest merge into the master branch of this > https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/26703, it seems that the core > framework is heading in a direction where functional/system tests are also > being accepted in a more formal way. If this is the case, imo, it would > make sense to also have a RAILS_ENV that is separate from the ubiquitous > 'test' env. In all my RoR projects where we have written automated > functional tests using some framework, we have had to duplicate 'test' into > something else. Would the community think that such a formalization makes > sense? > > tx, > Vijay > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
