Namespace is semantically different in that sub resources are nestled under an instance of the resource they represent, not just a static string.
i.e., /resource/1/subresource, not /resource/subresource On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:15 AM Rob Biedenharn <rob.biedenh...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you don't want the `resources` anyway, why not just use `namespace`: > > ==> config/routes.rb <== > Rails.application.routes.draw do > namespace 'users' do > get 'unsubscribe' > get ':id/foo', action: :foo, as: :foo > post ':id/bar', action: :bar, as: :bar > end > end > Prefix Verb URI Pattern Controller#Action > users_unsubscribe GET /users/unsubscribe(.:format) users#unsubscribe > users_foo GET /users/:id/foo(.:format) users#foo > users_bar POST /users/:id/bar(.:format) users#bar > > -Rob > > On 2018-Jan-18, at 08:26 , Kevin Deisz <kevin.de...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You can achieve this functionality by throwing this into the top of your > routes drawing block: > > ``` > def subresources(name, &block) > resources(name, only: [], &block) > end > ``` > > since that block is getting instance_eval'd anyway, this will just put > that method onto the routes object. Then you can: > > ``` > subresources :users do > ... > end > ``` > > and it'll have the same effect. > > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:57 AM, Nicholas Schwaderer < > nicholas.schwade...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I feel that `only: []` definitely is not an intuitive approach that shows >> what you would be trying to achieve in that instance. >> >> Also, I believe your only current alternative would be writing out your >> resourcing 'longhand' outside of an actual resources block in your >> `routes.rb`, correct? (I have seen all too many apps bloat with a lot of >> handscrawled routes) >> >> But since this is a bit aways from normal `resources` namespace usage >> maybe your alias ought to go all the way up to `resources` itself.... such >> as: >> >> ``` >> resources_without_crud :users do >> ... >> end >> ``` >> >> When I think of `resources` I think of the crud rails magic, and maybe it >> would help to make that even more explicit. Very interesting thought and >> thank you for raising it. >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 11:43:41 PM UTC, François Belle wrote: >>> >>> I would like to propose a feature that would be kind of an alias for >>> >>> resources :users, only: [] do >>> ... >>> end >>> >>> I thinks it's weird to have to specify an empty array when we need a >>> resourceful route without the default CRUD generated along. >>> >>> It would allow us to use it like the shallow feature >>> <https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/master/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/routing/mapper.rb#L1372> >>> : >>> >>> resources :users, without_crud: true do >>> get :unsubscribe, on: :collection >>> get :foo >>> post :bar >>> end >>> >>> And generate only: >>> >>> GET /users/unsubscribe >>> GET /users/:id/foo >>> POST /users/:id/bar >>> >>> >>> Any feedback would be greatly appreciated, thank you guys! >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > > -- > *Kevin D. Deisz* > CTO, CultureHQ <https://www.culturehq.com/> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- *Kevin D. Deisz* CTO, CultureHQ <https://www.culturehq.com> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
