Hi, All Referring to the procedure of site updating: * close site and show pretty "under construction, updating site" message, so that users don't get confused by half-updated site meanwhile migrations are being applied * perform QA check * open site
In order to minimize site downtime closing of site seems to be be to radical solution in reality to users.
There is an idea to keep site in state, where changes to DB aren deprecated during the update. During that time during the update this will be possible to do with less rush the QA check, apply migrations, update the next version of site. Then to switch document_root of server (frontend+backends) to a new updated copy. Now to return back to rails, and to the question =) It's logical to create a general solution on the ActiveRecord level that will not allow update, insert, delete. At the same time controller should somehow know about this and render some pretty view with maintenance content. Is this logic correct? How to correctly connect, i.e. how the model will let controller know that the maintenance is going on right now? Maybe there should be some exception in model, and controller will be getting this kind of specific exception? Best regards, -- Timur Vafin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
begin:vcard fn:Timur Vafin n:Vafin;Timur email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature