Alex, > Re bad reputation of lighty + FastCGI combo: most open source software is > written out of frustration (either with existing solutions, or with your day > job, and usually both). As far as I know, both Mongrel and mod_fcgid were > written out of frustration with mod_fastcgi.
That's a kind of pessimistic view of "scratch own itch" ;-) As far as I understand mod_fcgid with Apache 2.x is the way to go because of the troubles with the mod_fastcgi implementation of fastCGI for Apache 1.x. Mongrel is an alternative, and simpler approach, based in the use of a well know and workinf technology: reverse proxies. SimpleCGI (first Zed try) as a protocol is really simple compared to FastCGI, wich is really powerful but complex. But I am not sure where are the Lighty + fastCGI issues reported ... What have been reporte are the problems with proxy. Best regards, -- Aníbal Rojas http://www.rubycorner.com http://www.hasmanydevelopers.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Deploying Rails" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-deployment@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-deployment?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
