Hi Tom,
On 3/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 9, 2:12 pm, "roller8" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anyway, I was benchamrking various Nginx + Mongrel cluster configs and > > came up with what seems like my best performance for a regular Hello > > Rails page. > > Could you explain what a "regular" Hello Rails page is? :-) > > > Hardware: Dual dual-core Xeon, 16gb ram, SCSI SAS mirror. > > That's a lot of hardware. > > > Best test results: 6 Nginx and 5 Mongrels were enough to meet this. > > I tried more and less of both in different combos. I got approx. 215 > > req/sec +/- over about 5 httperf's tests with these params: > > Those numbers sound a low to me, actually. I'd expect at least 40 page > of session creation + rhtml render (no other DB activity) per core, > which > would be around 320/second. > > Is the DB on the same box? Was the test running on the same box? > > I'd recommend you run 8 nginx (1 per core), and 32 mongrels (4 per > core). > Is ~4 mongrels per core a normal baseline you start with for hardware like that? A site I'm working on will have a simliar setup -- 3 web servers with dual dual-core xeons, though with less ram (4 to 8 gigs). This would be behind Apache, though, would that change the recommendation of 4 per core? I plan on doing plenty of tests with http-perf, of course, just looking for a good starting point. - Rob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Deploying Rails" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-deployment@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-deployment?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
