You will still want to use Apache in front because it handles static files much faster than Mongrel. Plus as your site grows you can simply just add more Mongrels to handle the load.
-- Kyle Mathews http://www.titaniumdev.com On May 18, 5:57 am, Johan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh, and finally: > > Can 1 Mongrel server be useful (for small websites)? > I mean: can't you just use Mongrel on itself without putting an Apache > proxy in front of it? > I would think this makes things even easier...? > > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Deploying Rails" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-deployment@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-deployment?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
