On May 28, 9:52 am, Jesse Proudman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've also had some reservations about the performance of Xen under > high server load. HP recently conducted a performance evaluation of > Xen compared to OpenVZ (aka Virtuozzo) and while Solaris obviously > isn't in this report, the performance degradation that Xen faces upon > heavy server load really concerns me [1].
"We use the Xen 3.0.3 unstable branch" I wonder why they did that a time when 3.04, 3.04-1, and 3.04 tip was available? -- -- Tom Mornini --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Deploying Rails" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-deployment@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-deployment?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---