As far as i know, the main difference is that litespeed only uses one processor for the free version. However your rails application will use all the processors available to it. We use the free version for one site, medications.com that gets about a million pageviews per month without issue. On that same server, we run about 3 other lower traffic sites under litespeed as well.
- Ericson CTO http://www.funadvice.com On Jan 19, 2008 4:43 PM, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How is the standard (free) version of Litespeed when compared to some > of the other configurations? > > On Jan 19, 1:12 pm, "Ericson Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kathleen, > > > > Look into Litespeed.http://www.litespeedtech.com/home.html > > > > We use it for our large sites. (funadvice.com, medications.com and > others). > > It gets rid of the Nginx/lighty/apache/mongrel mess, and you can focus > on > > coding and your database. > > > > You dont have to worry about monitoring that stack. Just write your apps > and > > deploy them. I don't work there, and they dont pay me. Just a happy > > customer. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask. > > > > - Ericson Smith > > CTOhttp://www.funadvce.com > > > > On Jan 19, 2008 1:18 PM, Jesse Proudman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Kathleen, > > > > > Who's your hosting provider? They should be able to help you get > > > this up and running. > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Jesse Proudman > > > Blue Box Group, LLC > > > p. 800-613-4305 x 801 > > > > > On Jan 19, 2008, at 6:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > I've enjoyed the Google Rails forum for about a year now while I've > > > > completed my Rails 2.0 application and waited until the end to > figure > > > > out deployment. I've spent the last two weeks pouring over the many > > > > web posts and blogs about how to put this up under Ubuntu Gutsy > Gibbon > > > > (unless you have a better alternative) and can't find one source > that > > > > ties it all together. > > > > It seems the Ruby - Rails - Mongrel are easy but all sources (so > far) > > > > forget to deal with how one loads and starts MySqld. Over the last > > > > year my readings seem to point that Ngnix is the most efficient? > > > > Anyway, I am an aspiring individual who is will to pay for such > > > > advice. I expect (whoever) would help me write; > > > > 1. Installation and setup script. > > > > 2. How to stop the server, update the code, and then re-start > scripts. > > > > I am grateful for your reply or a suggestion of who I might > approach. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Kathleen > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Deploying Rails" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-deployment@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-deployment?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
