On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 01:16 -0800, Jeff wrote: > But wouldn't that setting also be affecting serving of static pages? > Right now I am getting 5000-8000 requests per second locally or about > 1200 over the wire for static files through Apache.
Yup, true, that would give you more static file capacity too. > I was able to get 185 requests per second out of Mongrel, but that is > still a bit underwhelming. I spent a few hours today studying the > Apache docs and settings for mod_proxy and mod_proxy_balancer and > testing different configs, but nothing made much difference. > > Right now a single mongrel process (not behind Apache) is pushing > 90-100 requests per second with my real app (not just a hello world > controller). So I am at a loss as to how the benefits are maxing out > at 2 mongrels when behind Apache. I'm probably not understanding.... so right now you're running Mongrel as both your web server and as your app container, is that right? Yours, Tom --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Deploying Rails" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-deployment@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-deployment?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
