On Mar 27, 2008, at 4:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>>        GFS from the Red Hat Cluster Suite is a good solution for  
>> this. We're
>> using it on ~1000XenVirtual Machines. It can be finicky to get
>> started with but once you spend some time getting used to its quirks
>> it is the best solution for a clustered filesystem available as open
>> source right now.
>
> I understand this is an older message.   I am wondering if anyone has
> experience setting up a solution like this with GFS or other
> distributed file system.  What does the hardware setup look like for
> something like this.
>
> I would like to run 50 to 100 xen virtual machines per physical server
> and am running into disk IO bottlenecks.   We would like to use lots
> and lots of commodity hard drives rather than an expensive hardware
> solution.
>
> Thoughts or examples on a good setup for this?


        What exactly are you trying to do? Do you need a clustered filesystem  
or just a bunch more disk IO per server? The best bang for your buck  
as far as getting a ton of disk spindles is coraid san's using AoE.

http://coraid.com/pdfs/datasheets/EtherDriveSR2461.pdf

        We use tons of these systems with high performance disks as well as  
off the shelf 400gig SATA commodity drives. The Xen domU's see a  
direct block device exported from the dom0 that talks to the coraid  
over AoE.


Cheers-
- Ezra Zygmuntowicz
-- Founder & Software Architect
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- EngineYard.com


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Deploying Rails" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-deployment@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-deployment?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to