That is what I'm doing, but the function creates a new Effect object every time the function is called. I'm not sure if there's a way to instantiate one Effect object and re-use it consistently rather than making new ones.
- Dave - On Apr 9, 1:00 pm, Diodeus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why not have the effect in a function and just call the function again > in afterFinish instead of nesting them? > > On Apr 9, 1:34 pm, dashifen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm working on creating a small progress meter using Scriptaculous and > > the behavior of that meter is such that when it reaches 100% an action > > occurs and then it returns to 0% and starts over again. I thought > > that it might be as simple as setting a function to the objects > > afterFinish property that would reset the bar's position and then call > > the effect's start() method. > > > For now, I've been able to produce the effect I need by creating a new > > Effect within the afterFinish handler of the old one, but I'm worried > > that this could make browsers suffer a slow and grueling death as > > these objects are created in memory. Is there a better way? > > > David Kees --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
