I am very sorry to ask so silly question. I am going to study the
prototype.js then get back to myself..... but thanks the same.

On May 17, 11:38 pm, wucho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, CP
>     Thank you very much.  Why can I use any argnames instead of
> "transport"?    ex.
>
> new Ajax.Request('/some_url',
>   {
>     method:'get',
>     onSuccess: function(__ANYARGS__){
>       var response = __ANYARGS__.responseText || "no response text";
>       alert("Success! \n\n" + response);
>     },
>     onFailure: function(){ alert('Something went wrong...') }
>   });
>
> where is __ANYARGS__ pass from ?
>
> On May 17, 11:15 pm, Christophe Porteneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Before 1.6, it was the XMLHttpRequest object.  Since 1.6, it's a
> > Ajax.Response object.
>
> > Check the docs on A.R callbacks (that didn't update to Ajax.Response,
> > though, and still state it's a XHR object):
>
> >    http://prototypejs.org/api/ajax/options
>
> > --
> > Christophe Porteneuve aka TDD
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to