I am very sorry to ask so silly question. I am going to study the prototype.js then get back to myself..... but thanks the same.
On May 17, 11:38 pm, wucho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, CP > Thank you very much. Why can I use any argnames instead of > "transport"? ex. > > new Ajax.Request('/some_url', > { > method:'get', > onSuccess: function(__ANYARGS__){ > var response = __ANYARGS__.responseText || "no response text"; > alert("Success! \n\n" + response); > }, > onFailure: function(){ alert('Something went wrong...') } > }); > > where is __ANYARGS__ pass from ? > > On May 17, 11:15 pm, Christophe Porteneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Before 1.6, it was the XMLHttpRequest object. Since 1.6, it's a > > Ajax.Response object. > > > Check the docs on A.R callbacks (that didn't update to Ajax.Response, > > though, and still state it's a XHR object): > > > http://prototypejs.org/api/ajax/options > > > -- > > Christophe Porteneuve aka TDD > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---