Very interesting and long. Thanks! Although when you need 85% comments to explain what the other 15% of the code is doing, that smells like a readability problem. ;-)
-Fred On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:02 PM, kangax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Take a look at this article, where "with" is used in a similar manner > to simulate "private static" members: > http://www.litotes.demon.co.uk/js_info/private_static.html > -- Science answers questions; philosophy questions answers. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
