Did you look a TrimQuery and rule it out? If so, I'd be interested in why (not a dig, seriously) -- was it too big (49k), too difficult to integrate, not powerful/flexible enough, etc., etc. -- T.J. Crowder tj / crowder software / com
On May 28, 7:57 am, hefeust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ooops ! > it's not as fine as i saidd > i m refactorying the code at the moment > but the objective is the same ! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
