Ryan, no need to get offensive about patterns that work for you (and your team). I am certainly not throwing pointless arguments about some hypothetical performance issues. Everything I said comes from experience in applications I have worked on. It also comes from people who worked on JS applications of a much larger scale than I have ever had (and who I learned a great deal of JavaScript from). I have no intentions of spreading heresy around this place. Your attitude is surprising at best. Constantly repeating how I'm "plain wrong" and making up assumptions about my reasonings, my experience and skills is not something I would expect of you. I gave a simple explanation of what "static" is referred to in JavaScript (or rather prototype.js). I also pointed out caveats of "private members" pattern. The truth is that there are no silver bullets (that you seem so desperately convince me to follow). There are also no "wrong" or "right". There are patterns that work in one environment and don't work in others.
Regards. On Jul 2, 7:32 pm, "Ryan Gahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just re-read my last post - kangax, sorry for getting all "DUDE!!" on you... > I'll try to keep my tone down if we continue the exchange :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
