"703 bytes vs. AspectJ’s 11062114 bytes" Hear, hear! :)
-Thomas Am 06.09.2006 um 22:50 schrieb John Beppu: > Hey prototype and scriptaculous fans: > > I've changed actsAsDecorator() into actsAsAspect(). Along the way, > I've fixed a few bugs and added new features. However, what's > surprising is that the code is even smaller than it was before. > I'm kinda happy about that, but more importantly... If you were > using actsAsDecorator() before, please use actsAsAspect() instead > (because it works a lot better). > > Here is the blog post: > http://beppu.lbox.org/articles/2006/09/06/actsasaspect > > Enjoy, > --beppu > > PS: I'm normally against copy-and-paste coding, but for actsAsAspect > (), I think it's an appropriate distribution mechanism. ;-) > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
