Martin Bialasinski a écrit : > [1,2,3,4,5].inGroupsOf(3) -> [[1,2,3],[4,5,null]] > > To me, null is something explicitly set by the user / developer to "no > value, not applicable", whereas undefined means "this value was not > set explicitly at all". I do believe the latter values ARE undefined. What you *see* in the text representation is a result of a pending bug in Object.inspect, that displays undefined's as null's. See http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5941 -- Christophe Porteneuve aka TDD [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
[Rails-spinoffs] Re: Enumerable.inGroupsOf() should fill up with undefined instead of null?
Christophe Porteneuve aka TDD Fri, 22 Sep 2006 06:56:17 -0700
- [Rails-spinoffs] Enumerable.inGroupsOf() sho... Martin Bialasinski
- [Rails-spinoffs] Re: Enumerable.inGroup... Christophe Porteneuve aka TDD
- [Rails-spinoffs] Re: Enumerable.inG... Martin Bialasinski
- [Rails-spinoffs] Re: Enumerable.inGroup... Thomas Fuchs
- [Rails-spinoffs] Re: Enumerable.inGroup... Thomas Fuchs
- [Rails-spinoffs] Re: Enumerable.inG... Martin Bialasinski
- [Rails-spinoffs] Re: Enumerable... Ryan Gahl
- [Rails-spinoffs] Re: Enumer... Martin Bialasinski
- [Rails-spinoffs] Re: E... Ryan Gahl
- [Rails-spinoffs] R... Martin Bialasinski
- [Rails-spinoff... Ryan Gahl
- [Rails-spinoff... Martin Bialasinski
