|
Whoa! Why is this a bug? I have code that might break with this
change. A better solution I think for backwards compatibility would be
to have an extra parameter that defaults to including disabled and if
passed "false" will not include disabled elements. Colin Thomas Fuchs wrote: Btw, just applied the patch to Prototype trunk, see http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/5354-Thomas Am 24.10.2006 um 09:33 schrieb Martin Bialasinski:On 10/24/06, Zyclops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
- [Rails-spinoffs] Re: Prototype: Form.serialize inclu... Colin Mollenhour
- [Rails-spinoffs] Re: Prototype: Form.serialize ... Michael Peters
- [Rails-spinoffs] Re: Prototype: Form.serial... Deco Rior
- [Rails-spinoffs] Re: Prototype: Form.serial... Christophe Porteneuve
- [Rails-spinoffs] Re: Prototype: Form.serialize ... Martin Bialasinski
