Thanks,
I gonna try getElementsByClassName()
About 120Kb, I know ...
It is a really big sample portal with many portlet so many XHTML ...
In real life it should be lighter.
On 10/25/06, Christophe Porteneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey Jean-Phillipe,
>
> Jean-Philippe Encausse a écrit :
> > Is there a solution to improve performances issues on $$ function under IE ?
> > On load I try to do $$('.test') on a big HTML (120kb) page and it
> > takes 5 seconds !
>
> I will refrain from ranting over a 120KB page... :-)
>
> If your expression is that simple, prefer
> document.getElementsByClassName('test'). It's supposed to be way faster
> (uses either DOM 3 XPath if available, otherwise reverts to a
> className-specific lookup on all elements).
> >
> > Is there hidden tips or clues to did it better ?
>
> Yes: find an ergonomy model for your app that doesn't yield 120KB pages
> :-) Of course, there will always be border cases. But does your page
> really have to be one of those?
>
> 'HTH
>
> --
> Christophe Porteneuve aka TDD
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >
>
--
Jean-Philippe Encausse - R&D Jalios SA
Jp [at] encausse.net - http://www.encausse.com - http://www.jalias.com
GTalk: jp.encausse [at] gmail.com - SMS: sms [at] jp.encausse.net
Mob: +33 6 82 12 56 99 Jalios: +33 1 39 23 92 83 Tel: +33 1 39 18 90 15
Do it Once, Use it Twice ~ Do it Twice, Make It Once
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
