Hey, BeeRich a écrit : > Hi there. Why would they return it this way? Does JS provide maps at > all? Would be easier to manage that way.
I'm not too sure I get what you mean, "why would they return it this way?". Aside from this, JS objects are a map of sorts (associations of property names with their values, usable with operators like '.' and '[]', modifiable at will, and iterable through the for/in construct), and Prototype takes this one step farther with the Hash object and the $H function. -- Christophe Porteneuve aka TDD [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
