One more thing... What is this "for use with rails."
I would not tie to a certain development environment. d On Nov 30, 2006, at 5:22 PM, Peter Michaux wrote: > > Hi Deco, > > On 11/30/06, Deco Rior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> So... if Peter really wants to make his mark, can he at least try to >> keep the API the same or compatible with Prototype. > > The API is similar in some places but can't stay the same. I am > writing a namespaced library. > > For example, > > new Insertion.Bottom(id, html) > > becomes > > FORK.Mutate.insertBottom(id, html) > > >> After over 12 months of investment, the barrier to migrate with a >> major code change to another library would be daunting. > > Fork probably isn't ready yet for this situation but eventually I > think the work would be worth it. > > >> In any case >> it would need to be something with some muscle behind it (by that I >> mean, contributers, funding, third-party certification). > > Perhaps one day. Not many open source software projects start with > this much muscle. > > >> No matter how good the code is, unless I have some degree of >> certainty that the next version of IE will not break it we cannot >> commit. > > I too need this code to work with IE 7. > > > Peter > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
