On 12/4/06, Andrew Dupont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to mention (once again) that nearly all criticism of Prototype > falls into two categories: > > (1) Stuff it does that you don't like (augmented prototypes, shallow > namespacing, syntactic sugar). These are philosophy differences, and > they are not subject to veto.
For the record, I do understand this and I have no desire to see prototype changed. I only intend to point out that the philosophy differences do not exist because people are ignorant, as implied by Mislav in the OP, but stem from people operating under different conditions. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
