On 12/9/06, Andrew Kaspick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Instead of renaming variables in the main source, just run an > obfuscater or do some fancy regex work over it and rename things to > whatever suits your fancy.
obfuscaters can cause bugs http://yuiblog.com/blog/2006/03/06/minification-v-obfuscation/ > I'd rather be able to "understand" the code I'm reading, rather than > "decode" it. $$() has meaning? This is part of the Prototype API. I think it is quite easy to keep track of a local variable called "el" for "element" in only 12 lines of code 3 of which are just close braces. Even if the variable names I used are expanded it would still be shorter than having the overhead of the abstract timer in Prototype. Peter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
