Marius Feraru wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Fred wrote: > > You proved my point: I don't understand what you mean by "choke". > My apologies, bad-bad wording indeed :)
No problem. > Anyway, in order to properly drop myself out of this discussion, I'll > say it again, as people seem to have a very wrong impression about my > posts in this thread: my post was neither "advocacy", nor any kind of > project "in the works", it was merely a presentation of some > _workaround_ for the problem raised by the starter of this thread. Understood - code posted to a news group should only be for examples, if only to cut the necessary clutter of full-strength stuff. It's also impossible to tell where a thread will end up, that's the beauty of Usenet. ;-) Public forms are important for expressing opinions and getting criticism - take it with a grain of salt (or sugar, as the mood takes you). [...] > To summarize, the problem was that getElementsByTagName() cannot be > reliably used on Gecko to get the list of elements in document's <head> > while it is still "loading". (Please read Fred's posts to get a higher > resolution picture). Cheers. I've learnt a thing or two about Gecko, the scriptaculous loader function got a kick, Peter's alternative got poked and prodded, hopefully his lodging of a better version through a ticket will deliver users a better script. Everyone's a winner! :-) [...] > merry coding ;-) Merry Christmas. -- Fred --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
