I'm wrong. I thought I'd done those tests in the past. I even grabbed my old test and ran it this morning successfully from Safari--I didn't realize that I'd set it up incorrectly, and was flummoxed when I could get it to run from localhost but not a live server. It wasn't until after I pulled out Ethereal to try and figure out the difference that I realized my mistake. Sometimes I can be pretty thick headed.
The [resolved] WebKit bug report is here: http://bugs.webkit.org/ show_bug.cgi?id=3812 Non-GET/POST methods work in the WebKit nightly.... does anyone know when we'll see the update in Safari? TAG [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Dec 18, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Mislav Marohnić wrote: > On 12/18/06, Tom Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gah. I should clarify. When I said Safari works, I mean that I've > used it successfully in the past, not that this particular test > worked. (Which Brad is right, it doesn't.) > > So how did you use these verbs successfully then? This test is very > straightforward, and if Safari doesn't pass this I don't see how it > could be that it supports these verbs. > > This is basically it (some logic stripped): > > xhr = Ajax.getTransport() > xhr.open(method, 'echo?m='+method, false) > xhr.send(null) > res = xhr.getResponseHeader('X-Test-success') || xhr.responseText > > And if Safari would pass this test, I would suggest stopping > emulating these 5 verbs in Prototype, yes. > > -- > Mislav > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
